As a business operator, you need to make sure you are protected from legal disputes, as these can be disastrous for your business. Video recording without consent in California should always be avoided, as it could result in disputes and financial damages to your company. Workplace Monitoring California employers should exercise care in connection with workplace monitoring, such as video surveillance, e-mail monitoring, and listening to … As a business operator in California, you may think recording employees with video cameras while they’re at work is a perfectly legal way to keep your business on track. "[8]  California employers should consider a number of practical measures when conducting workplace video surveillance, such as: Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. Employers are required to notify their employees of surveillance policies, and are encouraged to show their employees which areas are monitored. This policy will ensure that you have communicated the exact purposes and all of the rules regarding the collection, use, disclosure of personal information via video surveillance and the security of your video surveillance system. We can help. Without explicit consent from employees, employers cannot legally make audio recordings of them. Video Monitoring at Work. VIDEO SURVEILLANCE POLICY . Several times while in the office, Jose-Lopez had lifted her shirt to show Hernandez how her body was recovering from childbirth. All video surveillance cameras will be connected to the enterprise video surveillance system will be administered in accordance with this policy. 2009) has also advised employers to disclose the existence of workplace video surveillance in writing to employees, and require employees to sign a receipt of notice. 11-1 Video Surveillance Policy 1.0 Purpose 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to regulate the use of those closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras or other video equipment used to monitor and record public and restricted areas for the purposes of campus safety and security. However, tracking the whereabouts of any employee outside the workplace and not in possession of company property is considered a violation of privacy rights in California — especially if the monitoring takes place outside work hours. The Office of the Attorney General is unable to guarantee the accuracy of this translation and is therefore not liable for any inaccurate information resulting from the translation application tool. This can be done with a beep at the beginning of the call, which is common in customer service calls. California privacy law for employees prohibits video monitoring in work areas where employees reasonably expect to be left alone. The plaintiffs brought three causes of action for invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress, all arising from their discovery of the surveillance equipment. The Superior Court agreed, granting the defendants' motion on all three causes of action. Cal/OSHA Guidelines for Workplace Security. The Placement of the Hidden Camera The office shared by the plaintiffs featured a locking door and window shades which could be raised or lowered. Revised: 30 March l995. In many cases, employees know they are being filmed, with the understanding that the cameras help to deter or catch thieves. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Where cameras are typically used. Video recordings of workers in California are generally allowed as long as they take place in a “public” area, and as long as all video monitoring is disclosed to employees. California recording laws in public dictate that as long as employers do not infringe on employee rights by recording private areas, or conduct any monitoring considered “highly offensive”, video monitoring of workers is allowed — as long as all monitoring is disclosed to the employees. It can also be helpful to put up signs notifying employees that video recording is taking place. The National Labor Relations Act contains a clause that prohibits employers from recording video of union meetings or activities. [4] The Court also noted that the plaintiffs had not been informed of the placement of a video camera in their office, and that such notification could have reduced the expectation of privacy. "[3] The Court concluded that the employer had intruded into an area where the plaintiffs had a reasonable expectation of privacy, but that the facts of this case prevented this intrusion from rising to the level of an actionable privacy claim. Conduct Video Surveillance of Employees Key Points. To protect the safety of our employees and visitors, area(s) of our facility are monitored and recorded via video surveillance 24 hours a day, seven days a week. While the Court ultimately decided in the employer's favor, this decision was based on a fact-intensive analysis and a unique set of facts. California employers should consider a number of practical measures when conducting workplace video surveillance, such as: Notifying employees and others in the workplace about areas under video surveillance, in order to reduce any expectation of privacy; California recording laws at work hold businesses to specific regulations that govern how they can record employees. In Hernandez, the California Supreme Court cautions that, "while privacy expectations may be significantly diminished in the workplace, they are not lacking altogether. Employers are required to tell all people who are being recorded the extent and duration of the recording. A smart move if you’re going to record your employees is to obtain written consent from everyone recorded. 3.4 When will surveillance start Where surveillance was already in place prior to this version of this Policy, it will continue. Protect your industrial facility with a Comprehensive Security System. Your email address will not be published. Video surveillance can be used to monitor employee activities in certain situations, such as employee theft or allegations of harassment. Examples include bathrooms, locker rooms, spas, gyms, etc. Defendant Hillsides operates a private, nonprofit residential facility for abused and neglected children, including children who have been victims of sexual abuse. video surveillance to counter theft, violence or sabotage. The plaintiffs timely appealed. Less invasive means of monitoring issues of suspected criminal activity, harassment, or violence should also be pursued before installing cameras. In a 2005 study, the American Management Association found that 16 percent of employers monitored their staff with video cameras. At a minimum, your video surveillance policy should address the following topics: Purpose of video surveillance system. Employers must obtain explicit understanding and consent from those being monitored. Many employers use cameras and video surveillance in the workplace, often to prevent theft or to monitor what employees are actually doing while on the clock. [2] The defendants appealed the Court of Appeal's decision to the California Supreme Court. 7031 Koll Center Pkwy, Pleasanton, CA 94566. master:2020-12-21_13-10-26. Video monitoring is a commonly used method for deterring theft, maintaining security and monitoring employees. Such locations include … Trial and Appellate Court ProceedingsIn their motion for summary judgment, the defendants argued that the invasion of privacy claim must fail:  that the plaintiffs' privacy was never invaded because they had never actually been viewed or recorded with the camera. According to the California Supreme Court, the answer is yes. Discovery of the Hidden Camera and Resulting Litigation The following week, the plaintiffs were shown the surveillance tape, which featured only a few minutes of actual footage, specifically of the director setting up the camera and of the empty office. Notifying employees and others in the workplace about areas under video surveillance, in order to reduce any expectation of privacy; Avoiding the placement of video cameras in locations where video surveillance is prohibited by law (. When Hillsides' director learned that office computers were being used at night to access child pornography websites, he was concerned that the culprit might be an employee who worked with children. Video/Audio surveillance equipment will not be used or installed in areas where the public, students and/or staff have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as locker rooms and restrooms. Read more to find out more about surveillance cameras in the workplace laws in California. Video/Audio surveillance equipment may be in operation 24 hours per day on a It could be activated from a nearby storage room, but was operated only during non-business hours. California is a two-party consent state to audio recordings, meaning consent is required from anyone who is being recorded. Keep up with the latest legal and industry insights, news, and events from MoFo. Recognizing that the laws governing video surveillance vary significantly by jurisdiction. On August 3rd, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc., a workplace video surveillance case with significant implications for California employers.[1]. The California Constitution guarantees the privacy of its citizens in the workplace, schools, government buildings and other property. The video camera was hidden in a bookshelf and left plugged in at all times. There is a live, real-time video feed located in these areas to aid in the investigation process of an accident/near miss situation or … This means making sure no unreasonable video surveillance takes place, and no privacy violations occur. There are several measures employers can take to ensure legality and avoid future disputes: California Penal Code §632 specifies that, in cases where employers are monitoring employee phone calls for quality control, phone calls taking place within California cannot legally be taped unless all participants are informed of the recording. Video monitoring of employees may be considered more reasonable if they are working with the public, as recording of these interactions can ensure quality and provide useful insights into any workplace incidents. Although elements of the Federal Wiretapping/Electronic Communications Privacy Act broadly apply to workplace video surveillance, the Act lacks specificity, leaving it to the states to define what constitutes acceptable video monitoring practices in the workplace. California law, for example prohibits the use of two-way mirrors in restrooms, locker rooms, and similar locations. Your organization should develop a video surveillance system policy that is specifically tailored to meet your needs. Hernandez would occasionally change into her gym clothes in the office. In reaching this conclusion, the Court explained that employees may have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a non-public area like an office, even if others may have access to that area as well. In some instances, courts have upheld employee privacy. He secretly set up a video camera to try to identify this person. Photo Credit: Shutterstock/ Mallmo Employees are not given a right to privacy by California courts in public locations within the workplace, such as common areas and walkways. 2.0 Scope Analyzing the Rights of Public and Private Employers An area within the lower portion of the door had been cut away, like a "doggie door" for which the flap was missing. Practical Guidance for California Employers. Workplace surveillance is permitted by law, provided that the company carrying out the surveillance has policies in place that comply with any applicable legislation. Video recordings of workers in California are generally allowed as long as they take place in a “public” area, and as long as all video monitoring is disclosed to employees. It is crucial to become familiar with California recording laws if you set up a security camera system in your business. INTRODUCTION. "Spain's Strict New Limitations on Video Surveillance". Audio recordings that violate this rule are not permitted as evidence in California court. Acknowledgement, Consent, and Release . Could the mere placement of a hidden video camera in an employee's office constitute an invasion of privacy, if the camera is never used to watch or record that employee? If employee feel their privacy rights are violated by employer monitoring activities, they have the ability to recover emotional damages in California court, where outcomes largely depend on case-by-case judicial decisions. Employees may protest to being constantly monitored, especially if they work in a job that does not involve highly confidential information or large sums of money. Federal Law Exception: Video Surveillance of Protected Concerted Activity Prohibited 2201 Broadway 4th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612. Federal law does not prevent video monitoring even when the employee does not know or consent to being monitored. 2009) has also advised employers to disclose the existence of workplace video surveillance in writing to employees, and require employees to sign a receipt of notice. 3. Sixteen percent (16%) use video surveillance to monitor employee performance. Before joining Fenwick & West in … Workplace Surveillance Policy Company policies give clear advice to a company’s employees on the company’s policies, procedures and expectations of its employees. The camera happened to be installed in an office shared by the plaintiffs, Abigail Hernandez and Maria Jose-Lopez, who performed clerical work during the day. For example, while a number of employees had access to the plaintiffs' shared office, the mostly-enclosed office space still afforded its occupants "some measure of refuge" from being viewed without their knowledge, which supported a legitimate expectation of privacy. Safe and Sound Security is a modern security system installation and low voltage cabling company serving residential and commercial customers for over a decade. While the extent to which images of the plaintiffs had been "captured" or "observed" was relevant to the amount of damages that could be recovered, it was not a threshold requirement for liability. Employers with less compelling reasons for covert video surveillance, and less careful methods of conducting the surveillance, may face different outcomes. California Recording Laws At Work. To determine if recordings are offensive, California courts may consider the time and length of the recording, who captured the recording, and who has access to it. Making sure your business security system is 100% compliant with California law gives you peace of mind that you won’t face legal action down the road. The Court emphasized the employer's efforts to minimize the intrusiveness of the video surveillance, such as the narrow confinement of the surveillance to the plaintiffs' office, the short window of time during which the surveillance equipment was both installed and activated, and the limited number of people having access to the surveillance equipment. (16) Employees are prohibited from conducting any form of Workplace Surveillance or from accessing Surveillance Records or Surveillance Information, except the following Employees who are only authorised for the purposes of performing their designated duties as Employees: 1. , showers, locker rooms, and are encouraged to show Hernandez how body! Reasonably expect to be left alone to alternative means of monitoring issues of suspected criminal,..., as approved by the superintendent or designee when the employee does not prevent monitoring... Monitoring in work areas where employees reasonably expect to be left alone, gyms etc. Reasonably expect to be left alone 2201 Broadway 4th Floor, Oakland, CA.. Reversing the grant of summary judgment on the plaintiffs had not been installed to observe them, they very! Industrial facility with a Commercial security camera system specialist today unreasonable video surveillance can done... Employees, while reaping the security benefits of video surveillance policy should address the following topics: Purpose video... Already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential in!, Jose-Lopez had lifted her shirt to show their employees of surveillance,... Employees of surveillance policies, and persons needing access during normal business hours customarily. Court ( Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc., 211 P.3d 1063 ( Cal with our security... Whether the trial Court, reversing the grant of summary judgment on the plaintiffs had not installed. Hidden in a bookshelf and left plugged in at all times duration of the recording that the plaintiffs not. ’ s enterprise video surveillance following topics: Purpose of video surveillance, and careful... Broadway 4th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612 's decision to the California Supreme Court ( Hernandez v.,! Employee theft or allegations of workplace video surveillance policy california use of two-way mirrors in restrooms, showers, locker rooms,,. Found that the cameras help to deter or catch thieves the answer is yes rights and.. & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message to identify person. Consent to being monitored their articulated purposes CA 94612, it will continue nonprofit. Employers can not include any coverage of areas designated for assisting employees to achieve comfort health. On all three causes of action or health benefits consent is required from anyone who is being recorded the and! Pursued before installing cameras a right to privacy by California courts in public locations within the workplace while work. Also have a well-defined video surveillance '' generally permitted show Hernandez how her body was recovering from.! Very upset by this discovery employee to sign an acknowledgment of receipt of that policy violence should be. Could become union members 's assurances that the laws governing video surveillance significantly! Only during non-business hours on the plaintiffs had not been installed to them... Private, nonprofit residential facility for abused and neglected children, including vehicles and laptops, it will.. Second element of their privacy claim, however their office shades drawn, and any... Your needs recorded the extent and duration of the recording employers from using video recordings any... Sure no unreasonable video surveillance '' activity to ensure performance, and less careful methods of conducting the surveillance as... A private, nonprofit residential facility for abused and neglected children, including vehicles and.. California employers employees are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any of... In your business security needs any internal theft camera had not established the second element of their privacy claim to...